Comparison of Analog Modulation and Demodulation Using MATLAB

Authors

  • Rustamaji Lecturer, Bachelor's in Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology
  • Muhammad Razu Bachelor's Student in Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Bandung
  • ⁠Amanda Eka Adelia Bachelor's Student in Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Bandung
  • Abnah Dwi Firmansyah Bachelor's Student in Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v6i1.377

Keywords:

Additive White Gaussian Noise , Amplitude Modulation, Frequency Modulation, MATLAB Simulation, Phase Modulation

Abstract

Analog communication systems remain foundational in applications such as radio broadcasting and low-power wireless transmission, where low-frequency signals require modulation to overcome bandwidth limitations and noise susceptibility. This study aims to compare the modulation-demodulation performance of Amplitude Modulation (AM), Frequency Modulation (FM), and Phase Modulation (PM) using MATLAB simulations in the time-frequency domain under varying Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) conditions. Using a quantitative simulation-based comparative approach, the study evaluates three main analog modulation types across SNR variations of 10–30 dB with Nyquist-compliant sampling. The main instrument is MATLAB software; data analysis includes time-domain waveform comparison, FFT-based frequency spectrum analysis, and pre/post-demodulation SNR metrics. Results show that AM experiences significant waveform distortion at low SNR (10–20 dB), with narrow bandwidth but prominent sidebands in the frequency spectrum. FM and PM demonstrate superior demodulated waveform stability and greater noise resilience, despite wider bandwidth requirements consistent with Carson's rule. In conclusion, FM and PM are more suitable for noisy transmission channels, such as rural radio communication in Indonesia, providing a practical simulation-based reference for electrical engineering education and low-cost analog communication system design. Future work is recommended to extend validation toward analog-digital hybrid architectures using real hardware platforms such as Software-Defined Radio (SDR).

References

Acosta-Coll, M., Ballester-Merelo, F., & De-La-Hoz-Franco, E. (2020). Implementation of educational software for analog modulation using MATLAB App Designer. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, E33, 1–14.

Boulmalf, M., Semmar, Y., & Mawari, R. (2020). Teaching digital and analog modulation to undergraduate Information Technology students using MATLAB and Simulink. Proceedings of IEEE EDUCON 2020, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125388

Carlson, A. B., Crilly, P. B., & Rutledge, J. C. (2002). Communication systems: An introduction to signals and noise in electrical communication (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Haykin, S. (2001). Communication systems (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Hossain, M. J., & Rahman, M. A. (2021). MATLAB analysis and simulation of modulation and demodulation. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2021.2.1.0023

Latif, S., & Ahmad, T. (2021). Simulation and analysis of frequency modulation system in MATLAB as a practical assessment tool for communication engineering students. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, 6(1), 12–21.

Lathi, B. P. (1998). Modern digital and analog communication systems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

MathWorks. (2023). Analog passband modulation examples: MATLAB & Simulink documentation. The MathWorks, Inc. https://www.mathworks.com/help/comm/ug/analog-passband-modulation-examples.html

Okonkwo, C. (2024). Performance evaluation of modulation schemes in AWGN and fading channels. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 11(2), 78–86. https://ijsrst.com/paper/12419.pdf

Oraibi, H. A., & Qader, I. N. (2022). Teaching frequency modulation to undergraduate electrical and electronic engineering students using MATLAB/Simulink. Journal of Engineering Education Transactions, 35(3), 1–10. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Teaching-Frequency-Modulation-to-Undergraduate-and-Oraibi-Qader/86d149cba128bda353f4885a94

Proakis, J. G., & Salehi, M. (2007). Digital communications (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sudaryono. (2022). Metodologi penelitian ilmu rekayasa teknologi. Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

Taub, H., & Schilling, D. L. (1986). Principles of communication systems (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Telkom University. (2020). Design and simulation of AM, FM, and PM modulation and demodulation. E-Proceeding of Engineering, 7(2), 4521–4530. https://ejournal.telkomuniversity.ac.id

Ziemer, R. E., & Tranter, W. H. (2014). Principles of communications: Systems, modulation, and noise (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Rustamaji, Muhammad Razu, ⁠Amanda Eka Adelia, & Abnah Dwi Firmansyah. (2026). Comparison of Analog Modulation and Demodulation Using MATLAB. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v6i1.377

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)