Analisis Grade Specialty Arabika Pagur Madina Menggunakan Metode AHP

Authors

  • Erin Alawiyah Siregar Program Studi Agroteknolog, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Graha Nusantara
  • Rama Dani Eka Putra 2 Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Universal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v2i1.29

Keywords:

AHP, Kopi, Arabika Pagur Madina

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify internal and external factors that affect the quality of Pagur arabica for the export market. Furthermore, from the identification, a development strategy for export quality Arabica will be drawn up. Data were obtained from 3 specialties Arabica coffee producers. The data analysis used AHP to determine quality criteria that are in accordance with export coffee quality standards, including moisture content, value of bean defects, levels of impurities and uniform coffee bean size.  A total of 10 experts were asked to choose alternatives based on predetermined criteria. The analysis of the weighting of the producer selection data in this study was carried out using the analytical hierarchy process method. The results showed that the criteria that most influenced the selection of Pagur Madina specialty arabica coffee producer grades were the criteria for bean defects with a weight of 0.409, the criteria for bean size with a weight of 0.213, the criteria for dirt content with a weight of 0.213 and the last criterion was the criterion of water content with a weight of 0.069. Meanwhile, the best producer chosen by the respondents is Producer Z with a weight of 0.678 then producer Y with a weight of 0.170 and the last producer priority is supplier X with a weight of 0.152.

References

Azwar, S. (2007). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

AEKI. 2017. Statistik Kopi. Asosiasi Eksportir Kopi Indonesia. Jakarta.

Ciptadi, W.dan Nasution, Z. 1985. Dedak Padi dan Manfaatnya. Jurusan Teknologi Industri Pertanian. Fateta IPB. Bogor.

Dinas Pertanian Bagian Perkebunan. 2017. Laporan Tahunan 2016. Dinas Pertanian Mandailing Natal. Kabupaten Madina. Sumatera Utara.

Fatmawati, Medelina Shinta. 2007. “Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam Mengukur Kualitas Jasa Lembaga Amil Zakat di Surakarta”. Skripsi Sarjana Yang Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Langen, N, 2011. Are Ethical Consumption and Charitable Giving Substitutes or Not Insight Into Consumers’s Coffee Choice. Food Quality and Preference 22: 412-421.

Nydick, Robert L and Ronal Paul Hill. 1992. Using the Analitic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Produsen Selection Procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management2.

Saaty, Thomas L. 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh USA

Siswoputranto, P. S. 1993. Kopi Internasional dan Indonesia. Kanisius. Semarang. SNI 01-2907-2008 (SNI). Standar Nasional Indonesia. 2008. Biji Kopi (SNI 01-2907-2008). Badan Standar Nasional.

Taylor, P. L., 2005. In The Market but not if it : Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewadship Council Certification as Market-based social Change. World Dev., 33: 129-147.

Weber, Charles A., John R. Current and W.C. Benton. 1991. Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operations Research 50 (1991) 2-18.

Wilda. 2012. Perbedaan Kopi Arabika Dan Robusta. http://www.kopistory.com/article/perbedaan-kopi-arabika-dan-robusta

Yusianto. 2017. Peranan Uji Cita Rasa dalam Industri Perkopian. Pusat Peneliti Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia. Bogor.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-17

How to Cite

Alawiyah Siregar, E. ., & Dani Eka Putra, R. (2022). Analisis Grade Specialty Arabika Pagur Madina Menggunakan Metode AHP. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM), 2(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v2i1.29

Issue

Section

Articles