An Eco-Futuristic Approach to Boxing Community Center Design

Authors

  • Andrie Herdiansyah Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Gifranza Gifranza Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Imbardi Imbardi Universitas Lancang Kuning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v5i2.343

Keywords:

Mass Composition, eco-futuristic, sustainable, Architecture

Abstract

The development of urban areas demands the existence of community sports facilities that not only function as physical activity spaces, but also as a medium for shaping environmental quality and the identity of sustainable public spaces. The Boxing Community Center is characterized by high-intensity activities that produce special demands on thermal comfort, air quality, and spatial flexibility. This study aims to examine how an eco-futuristic appropriate is applied in the formation of the Boxing Community Center building mass composition and its implications for environmental performance and architectural expression. The research method used is qualitative-descriptive through literature review, analysis of sports building precedents, and exploration of design concepts. The results of the study show of that the application of fragmented, layered, and climate-adaptive mass composition can improve natural ventilation, daylighting, and the quality of the transition space between the building and the outside environment. In addition to contributing to energy efficiency, this mass composition strategy also creates a dynamic and futuristic architectural image that is in harmony with the character of boxing. This study confirms that the processing of building mass with an eco-futuristic approach plays an important role as a passive strategy as a basis for designing community sports facilities that have optimal environmental performance and long-term flexibility.

References

Ching, F. D. K. (2015). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Faridan, N. Y., & Utami. (2021). Penerapan Arsitektur Futuristik pada Bangunan Ekshibisi dan Konvensi Di kota Baru Parahyangan. Fad, 1, 1–8. https://eproceeding.itenas.ac.id/index.php/fad/article/view/777%0Ahttps://eproceeding.itenas.ac.id/index.php/fad/article/download/777/650.

Fauzi, M., Sundari, T., & Samra, B. (2019). Pekanbaru Science And Technology Center. Jurnal Teknik, 13(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.31849/teknik.v13i2.3468

F.X. Budiwidodo P dan Y. Roni S. (2014) Teknik Pendekataen Desain Bentuk Estetik Arsitektural. Bandung : PT. Kanisius

Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Washington DC: Island Press.

Iriani, W. L., & Subiyantoro, H. (2023). Ecological Architectural Concepts of Museum Buildings in the Humid Tropics (Case Study: Museum Gunungapi Merapi). Arsitektura, 21(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v21i1.70658

Jencks, C. (2011). The Story of Post-Modernism. London: Wiley.

John, G., & Sheard, R. (2012). Stadia: A Design and Development Guide. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Larasati, R. A., & Satwikasari, A. F. (2022a). a Study of Ecological Architecture Concepts in the Residence of Glintung Village, Malang City. Jurnal Koridor, 13(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v13i1.6283

Larasati, R. A., & Satwikasari, A. F. (2022b). STUDY OF ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE CONCEPT IN THE RESIDENCE OF KAMPUNG GLINTUNG , MALANG. 13(01). https://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v13i1.6283

Novinda, C., Cahyono, U. J., Arsitektur, P., Teknik, F., Sebelas, U., & Surakarta, M. (2020). Prinsip Aksesibilitas Arsitektur. 3(2), 2020–2024.

Nugrahaini, D. H. (2024). Study of Futuristic Architectural Forms Towards the Function of Convention Buildings (Case Study: Indonesia Convention Exhibition (ICE), BSD). International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijau.v8i1.15411

Kronenburg, R. (2015). Flexible Architecture: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Sidik, & Fauzi, D. (2016). Implementasi Konsep Arsitektur Ekologi Pada RancangBangun Rumah Minimalis. Jurnal Techno Nusa Mandiri, XIII(1), 23–31.

Vale, B., & Vale, R. (2013). Living within a Fair Share Ecological Footprint. London: Routledge.

Vinky Rahman, & Siregar, S. N. (2020). The Riverfront Conservatory (Conservatory Design in Kualanamu Region with Futuristic Architecture Approach). International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 4(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijau.v4i1.3861

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Andrie Herdiansyah, Gifranza, G., & Imbardi, I. (2025). An Eco-Futuristic Approach to Boxing Community Center Design. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM), 5(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v5i2.343